How the work moves today
A plain map of how a job actually travels through your business, in your language rather than a consulting framework. Most owners find something here they did not know was happening.
Two weeks. Fixed fee. Written findings.
Most companies do not have an AI problem. They have five or six things that should not still be done by hand, and no reliable way to tell which one to fix first. This engagement answers that question in writing, before anyone builds anything.
What you are buying
The cost of guessing wrong about AI is a year and a budget. Companies commit to the wrong workflow, discover it eighteen months in, and conclude the technology does not work for them. Usually the technology was fine and the target was wrong.
This engagement exists to pick the target properly. WRAG interviews the people who actually do the work, looks at the systems you already pay for, and writes down what we found. You end up with a prioritized plan in plain language, and it is yours whether or not we ever work together again.
The deliverable
A plain map of how a job actually travels through your business, in your language rather than a consulting framework. Most owners find something here they did not know was happening.
The full list of things that could be automated or restructured, each with an honest read on the effort it would take and the payoff it would return. Including the ones that are not worth it.
Ranked, with the reasoning for that order written out. Sequence matters more than selection, because the first project either buys you credibility internally or spends it.
Where AI would add risk, cost or fragility without a real return. In most assessments this is the most valuable page in the document.
What the recommended projects would take to build and run, so you can budget with a real number instead of a vendor estimate. No obligation attached to any of it.
Fixed scope, fixed calendar
Four to six interviews of about forty five minutes, with you and with the people doing the work day to day. Not a workshop, not a steering committee, and nothing for your team to prepare beforehand.
WRAG looks at what you already own and pay for. The answer is often a capability sitting unused inside software you renewed last quarter, which is a cheaper fix than anything new.
Findings, priorities and exclusions, written out. Every recommendation carries the reasoning behind it so your team can argue with it rather than take it on faith.
One hour together going through the document, so nothing in it is a surprise or a mystery. Then it is yours, and the decision about what happens next is entirely yours as well.
First-party proof
These engagements began the same way this one does, with a look at how the work actually moved before anything got built. Each names the client, with their permission, and describes what was delivered.
Before you commit
$3,500, fixed, invoiced at the start on net 15 terms. If you decide to go ahead afterward, the engagement is a three month minimum at $3,500 per month, and the assessment fee is credited in full against your first month.
No. The document is yours to keep and to act on however you choose, including handing it to another firm or to your own team. There is no obligation attached to it, and no clause that makes WRAG harder to replace later.
Then the document says so and explains why. That is a legitimate outcome, and it is far cheaper to learn in two weeks than in a year. Automating a broken process does not fix it, it industrializes the breakage.
Four to six conversations of about forty five minutes with the people who do the work, plus one hour at the end to walk through the findings. Nothing needs preparing in advance.
Companies of roughly twenty to two hundred people where someone senior will own the outcome. Two conditions decide whether it works: a named person inside who will still be there in a year, and an underlying process that basically functions today. If either is missing, WRAG will tell you before you pay.
No. Nothing is certified and nobody is grading you. WRAG also does not resell software and takes no commission from any product it might recommend, so the recommendations answer to your business rather than to a vendor.